<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>People Before Profit blog</title>
		<link>http://104.192.218.19/October-2003-26114/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://104.192.218.19/October-2003-26114/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>

		
		<item>
			<title>Marlins cruise, Yankees lose</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/marlins-cruise-yankees-lose/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The Thrill and the AgonyThis week in sports by Chas Walker&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Marlins cruise, 
Yankees lose&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Florida Marlins stunned the baseball world by defeating the New York Yankees 4 games to 2 in the World Series. Few expected such results – the Marlins just slipped into the playoffs in the NL wild card slot. They proceeded to march through San Francisco, where they downed the Giants, and Chicago, where they came back from a 3-1 deficit to beat the Cubs.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But the Marlins are all about comebacks. Last year, Florida finished 79 and 83 during the regular season. They began this season 16 and 22 before canning Jeff Torborg as manager and hiring a miracle-maker, 72-year-old skipper Jack McKeon. From May 23 (12 days after McKeon was brought on board) onward, no team in baseball amassed a better win-loss record.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McKeon has now become the oldest manager to ever win a World Series.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Like those that came before them, the Bronx Bombers proved to be no match for the Fighting Fish. Though New York outspent Florida nearly 3 to 1 (the Yanks 2003 payroll was $180 million, the Marlins payroll was $63 million), it could not outplay them on the baseball diamond. The Yankees had all of the guns, but none of the ammo.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Game Six – the decisive game – was played on Saturday evening to a sold-out crowd in Yankee Stadium. It typifies the gritty play of the series. The Marlins scored 2 runs on 7 hits (all singles), and Josh Beckett pitched a complete game to hold the Yankees to 0 runs on 5 hits. Pitching on just three days rest, Beckett struck out nine players in pinstripes.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Aggressive baserunning put Florida a run ahead in the fifth inning. Luis Castillo hit a single sharply to right field and Alex Gonzalez took off from second base, tore around third, and deftly slid around New York catcher Jorge Posada’s swinging tag, just inches from his arm as it tapped home plate.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the sixth inning, the Marlins added another when New York shortstop Derek Jeter lost his cool on a grounder, bobbling the ball and botching a throw to first to allow Jeff Conine to get on base. After walking Mike Lowell, pitcher Andy Pettite fielded a bunt from Derrek Lee to throw Lowell out at second base. Conine advanced to third base on the play, and with one out, Juan Encarnacion belted a sacrifice fly to right field, sending Conine home.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Beckett kept the Yankees down for the remainder of the game – finding his way out of tricky situations by striking out the sluggers or getting them to ground into double-plays. Fittingly, in bottom of the ninth inning, it was Beckett who applied the final tag to Jorge Posado, who chopped a grounder down the first base line.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“I am elated,” Jack McKeon commented to the press. “I didn’t have any idea that we would win in the playoffs or win the wild card. I had no idea we would get to the World Series and I had no idea we would win the World Series. ... But being with these guys and seeing the attitude and the determination, the desire – we were on a mission.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Note: Look for my upcoming feature review of Press Box Red, the biography of Walter Rodney, sports editor of the Daily Worker from 1936 to 1958, along with an interview by Tim Wheeler with Mr. Rodney and Irwin Silber, the book’s author.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at pww@pww.org&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/marlins-cruise-yankees-lose/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;‘Freedom’ to destroy?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“1984” here we come again! Welcome to the library of the future: the library with no past. Also, check out the new “Department of Double Standards.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This from the Ananova news web site: “Russian libraries throw out communist ‘propaganda’. … Almost three quarters-of-a-million books on communism are being thrown out of libraries in Russia. Twenty libraries in the Russian Baltic enclave of Kaliningrad have sent 700,000 books on communist ideology to recycling plants. Elena Alesandronets, head of the Kaliningrad Library System, told the Rosbalt news agency only a few of the books, which she described as largely ‘Marxist and Leninist propaganda,’ in their stocks would be kept. She said: ‘No one’s had any interest in them since the Soviet Union collapsed. They were just gathering dust and we needed space for more modern literature.’”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mark C. RosenzweigNew York City&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On market socialism&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I was recently reading an paper about the current state of health care in China by Brian A. Wong and Satyananda J. Gabriel (“The Influence of Economic Liberalization on Urban Health care Access”) and I was rather angered to learn that the once free and universal system of health care has been wholly privatized and replaced by a fee-for-service system. With the gap between rich and poor growing wider every day, the poor in China are left with nothing to do and the state of private health insurance is still very inadequate. When debating the merits and demerits of the market and the plan in a socialist economy we have to remember what the purpose of production in a socialist economy is, and that purpose is to serve the common good, i.e., free and universal access to health care, full employment the right to adequate shelter, etc., and not to produce cheap sneakers for the international market so you can make money so you can produce more cheap sneakers for the international market.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Matt HelmeOld Bridge NJ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Robeson stamp took struggle&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve just read in the 10/18-24 People’s Weekly World that one of the greatest figures ever to emerge from this tortured land is to be honored in a postage stamp. This is truly astonishing, because the U.S. government hated, feared, hounded and persecuted Paul Robeson and almost erased his name from the distorted official version of history. And now a postage stamp will commemorate him. How come? Not because the authorities have seen Judgment Day looming up on the horizon. Like all the other hard-won rights for ordinary folk, it took hard work and perseverance. In fact, it took years of struggle and over 200,000 signatures. Perhaps some contradictions are to be welcomed. Let’s all celebrate the indomitably courageous life of a truly great human being. Amandla!
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ken CarstensAlbany ME &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Helpful dialogue&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I am writing to express my thanks for the wonderful articles on socialist economics you have been printing lately. I think it is important to not just highlight the struggle of the working class, but to also educate the readers of the content of our ideology. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ben Wheelervia e-mail &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stop privatizing schools&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The people of St. Louis are attempting to stop the privatizing of their public school system. Its school system elected four new members recently, and we were told that they cannot be recalled.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
At one time in the history of this country it was against the law to teach people of African decent to read and write: “free” or slave. Today we have been told that it’s against the law to recall the newly-elected members of the St. Louis public school system (“the Gang of Four”).
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We didn’t accept the dictate of our racial history then, and shouldn’t accept the undemocratic mandate of it today. Any duly elected official is subject to the will of the people, and if they do not perform in the interest of this public trust they should be removed, and where appropriate, recalled.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And to deny us this right of recall will deny us the right to charter a course of justice and democracy. It will deny that the people are the ultimate power, and that the people have the right to struggle, unimpeded for “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bob WilliamsSt. Louis MO&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Editorials</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Bush, LBJ and Nixon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite retooled White House public relations efforts to sell the disastrous Iraq war and occupation, George W. Bush is looking more and more like the proverbial used-car salesman who covers up a car’s flaws with paint and polish, sets back the odometer, and tries to palm off a lemon on an unsuspecting customer.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, of course, we’re not talking about a used car, but about an invasion and conquest that is costing thousands of lives, fanning the flames of terrorism, and draining the resources of both Iraq and our own country.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Emblematic of the lies and deceptions is Bush’s sleazy attempt, in his Oct. 28 press conference, to blame his May 1 “Mission Accomplished” claim on “members of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln,” – the aircraft carrier where he staged the photo op. White House press secretary Scott McClellan later claimed that “those on the ship” asked the White House to do the “Mission Accomplished” banner, and the White House merely complied. Does anyone believe this? We have all seen numerous Bush appearances before glitzy backdrops featuring the administration’s slogan of the moment, just in case we tuned out what he was saying.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When a reporter asked if he will follow previous plans to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq over the next year, Bush called it a “trick question, so I won’t answer it.” He vowed to “stay the course” in Iraq.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bush’s press conference performance underscores the pattern of lies, cover-ups, stonewalling and scapegoating that characterize this administration. His officials now say they may shift intelligence staff in Iraq away from the search for weapons of mass destruction to beef up counterinsurgency operations. In effect, they are admitting the non-existence of their main justification for the war.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We remember how Lyndon Johnson vowed to “stay the course” in Vietnam. That disastrous policy led to the demise of LBJ’s presidency. Nixon lied, stonewalled and scapegoated. He was forced out of office.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bush deserves the same treatment.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*   *   *   *   *   *
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Save Pell Grants&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What to do when the economy is weak, unemployment is high, and a college degree is a prerequisite for many jobs? If you’re in George W. Bush’s Department of Education, it seems that the answer is to continue to shaft working-class families by making changes to the federal Pell Grant program. The changes will mean over 84,000 students will lose their grant money in 2004 and about 1.5 million others will see their grants reduced. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And in typical Bush administration fashion the changes are stealth – hiding behind the opaque, curtain of bureaucracy. The Department of Education is going to change a tax formula, untouched for a decade, in a way that denies families credit for state and local taxes paid. And this from an administration that claims to cut taxes (for the rich, that is).
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Pell Grant program, since its inception in the 1970s, has made it possible for millions of students to get a college degree. Currently, almost 5 million students receive Pell funding. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
States are facing the worst budget crisis since WW II. More federal funding for college education is needed now more than ever. Tuition costs are rising, as they have been for years, much faster than inflation or incomes. But the Bush administration’s proposed changes will wind up putting higher education out of reach for many children of working-class families. The erosion of this and other need-based aid programs risks returning higher education to something only available to the rich.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Post-secondary education has become one of the quintessential American dreams and, for many of today’s jobs, it’s a necessity. Thanks to programs like Pell Grants, it has become an attainable dream for many more children over the past 30 years. While rising tuition rates are a problem that needs to be addressed, cutting the number of families eligible for Pell Grants solves nothing.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Congress should continue to block these changes and ensure that the Pell Grant program is fully funded.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Alabama setback</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/alabama-setback/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Almost every state faces a severe financial crunch, with taxes and spending cuts dominating the news. In September, Alabama had a chance to vote on a real solution to its budget crisis. The opportunity was lost, shot down by corporate money and right-wing ideology.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Alabama faced a $675 million shortfall for the budget year that began Oct. 1, even after cutting $275 million last year. Other states have balanced their budgets with accounting gimmicks, raiding trust funds, increased tobacco taxes, cutting vital services, and stiffing cities and local governments. Alabama could have been different.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Bob Riley was elected governor after serving in the U.S. Congress where he won the title of “most conservative member.” He saw a state that has starved public services, is near the bottom in education, and has the nation’s second-worse infant mortality rate. The working class pays 9-11 percent of their income in taxes while the rich pay only 4 percent, making Alabama one of the 10 worst states for tax unfairness.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Riley, unlike his former supporters in the Christian Coalition, apparently took seriously the biblical injunction to help the poor. He proposed and passed an ambitious $1.2 billion plan to close the budget gap and transform Alabama’s education system from one of the country’s worst to one of its best. The tax burden would be shifted from lower- and middle-income families to wealthy households and big out-of-state corporate landowners, so that two-thirds of Alabamans would pay the same or less in taxes. In addition, it would make the state’s revenue stream more stable for the future.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The plan was opposed by bankers, by the timber interests that own much of Alabama’s land, by the Republican Party, the Alabama Christian Coalition, and national anti-tax groups. The Republican governor’s plan was supported by the Democratic Party, African American state legislators, unions, and some local business groups.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a statewide referendum Sept. 9, Alabama voters rejected the plan by a 2-1 margin. Polls showed opposition spread across all income levels – even low-income voters, who would have benefited most, were overwhelmingly against it. The result of the vote has been deep cuts, including education and health care. It is likely that working-class families, whose taxes would have been cut under the Riley plan, will see tax increases instead.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How could such a big majority in Alabama be persuaded to vote against their own interests?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Some reasons were particular to Alabama. Working-class voters were suspicious of a plan coming from the Republican Riley, who had never before taken progressive positions. These suspicions grew, especially amongst African Americans, when Riley refused to sign a bill making it easier for former convicts to regain voting rights. But other reasons for the defeat in Alabama reflect nationwide trends.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tax expert David Brunori summarizes: “Large absentee landowners who would see their tax burdens rise have funded a vicious and deceitful campaign against the governor. Those rich folks, who don’t even live in Alabama, have teamed up with right-wing, antigovernment fanatics (who also don’t live in Alabama) to distort the debate and smear the governor.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These “antigovernment fanatics” have a well-funded, nationwide network whose propaganda dominates the corporate media. Foremost among these fanatics is Grover Norquist, described as “an insider with White House pull matched by few others, the indispensable man” for the Bush policy of tax cuts for the rich. In Alabama, Norquist “helped deliver a 2-1 popular majority against the tax hike, but his real goal was to turn the Alabama vote into a national object lesson for other politicians.” (John Maggs in the National Journal.)
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, their strategy is working. So far, voters have been asked, “Would you rather raise taxes or cut government?” The answer in Alabama was, “Cut government.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have to find a way of asking different questions. Instead of “how much taxes,” the questions should be: “Who pays taxes?” – “Should the richest people continue to pay only one-third to one-half the tax rate paid by low- and middle-income working people?” – “Should giant multinational corporations continue to get away with paying less each year in state and local taxes, even while receiving corporate welfare?”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The answers to those questions will reveal that we can afford decent education, health care, and programs for children and seniors, even while we cut workers’ taxes. And at local, state, and national levels, these questions can help shift the entire political debate and help defeat George Bush and his right-wing, anti-people policies in 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at arthur.perlo@pobox.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/alabama-setback/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Grocery strike solid</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/grocery-strike-solid/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;VENICE, Calif. – Several hundred workers and supporters from the community turned out in front of a Ralphs Market here Oct. 18 for a rally in support of the striking grocery workers. The strike and lockout involves over 70,000 grocery workers in Southern California.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Democratic candidate for president, addressed the crowd.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“Every worker who’s ever had their wage knocked down must support your efforts,” Kucinich told the spirited crowd. “Every worker who’s ever been asked to sacrifice their health care benefits must support your efforts.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Many other speakers, such as movie and television personality Ed Asner, gave speeches supporting the workers. United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 1442 President Mike Staeter warned that “it could be a long strike and the corporations want a war!” Ellen Anreder, another UFCW spokeswoman, said, “the supermarkets must first make a new contract offer. The workers rejected the offer that was on the table. Unless there’s a new offer, there’s really no way to talk.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After the speakers finished addressing the rally, the workers and their supporters marched around the front of the market with signs and chants, urging consumers and workers to observe the picket line. They also got great responses from cars honking in solidarity from the street.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
At press time, the UFCW, AFL-CIO, the National Organization for Women, and religious, health advocacy and community groups were making plans for the announcement Oct. 30 of a major initative to support the striking workers, including nation-wide financial support.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at kelsdrumr@webtv.net&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/grocery-strike-solid/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;More on nonpartisan elections&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to examine the arguments for nonpartisan elections from every angle possible.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why, as some assert, would third party candidates receive more votes in nonpartisan elections? Simply because they are “independent”? I think not. A candidate must do the work to gain recognition and trust regardless of party affiliation.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As for party labels, I for one would like to know if a candidate has Nazi or fascist leanings.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This morning, Oct. 21, on WNYC, it was announced that Mayor Bloomberg may have used his own money to send out a glossy color brochure on the merits of non-primary elections. The mayor’s name was nowhere to be found on the brochure. Why not be honest and open about our intentions? And let the voters decide.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gabe FalsettaGlendale NY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anti-immigrant governor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Southern Poverty Law Center in its Report 2003, September, states that none other than Arnold Schwarzenegger is on the board of the anti-immigrant organization U.S. English.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a present-day organizational tie by the governor-to-be of California (by deceit and manipulation) to an anti-immigrant stance closely tied to white supremacy. Here is a menacing power grab by a Bush and corporate lack. This grab is a clear and present danger to democratic rights that makes it even more urgent to build unity to show Bush the door in 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;George FishmanNew Haven CT&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Destruction of confidence&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Will Bush’s law annihilate the confidence in schools and the teachers’ motivation for teaching? Definitely, if the law keeps labeling the schools as “failing.” This is what Terrie Albano’s article (PWW 10/3) is all about. It gravely discusses how the new law passed by Bush inflicts chaos among the schools and its students.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The article uses statistics to accurately describe its point – that schools are losing confidence due to government tests. Furthermore, it expresses a parent’s and child’s reaction to school that supports how the law is affecting everyone.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Bush administration passed this law to help increase the students’ achievement; however, he should use a positive method such as expanding the education budget to improve schools who score “below average” on these tests. By putting down the schools, he is only hurting their self-worth and image. Bush must use a constructive technique to get the schools to carry out their dreams of being successful.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Manisha Mishra and Irina TarnaskyChicago IL&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Creeping fascism? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Barbara Russum’s letter concerning fascism in Europe and Chile is very appropriate today. Fascism is an open, terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary sectors of the capitalist class in the service of finance (that is monopoly capitalism). That is the classic and still valid Communist definition of fascism developed by the Comintern in the 1920s and 1930s. It means that fascism is a movement for the ruling class, even if its most visible supporters are drawn traditionally from racist elements of the lower middle classes.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Without the support of industrialists, bankers, and existing elites generally, the Italian and German fascist parties could not have come to power. It is also important to remember that right-wing governments, especially in Germany in the early 1930s, paved the way for Hitler’s triumph by undermining the people’s democratic rights, while the Social Democratic and Communist parties were in conflict with each other. Only a broad United Front, of the kind Communists fought for after 1935, could defeated fascism before before WWII, possibly preventing what was the most destructive war in history.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Bush administration, although it has not yet become an open terroristic dictatorship, has definite fascist tendencies – a point that people throughout the world are noticing and commenting on. Fascism in its incipient or full blown form has never been opposed by the upper classes or defeated by Center-Right politicians who offer no solutions to the problems that produce fascist movements to begin with and usually try to co-opt and appease fascist policies, like Joseph Lieberman and other conservative Democrats who support the “Patriot Act,” the Iraq war, and the Ashcroft Justice Department assault on the Bill of Rights. It will take the broadest unity of our Black, Brown, and white, male and female, gay and straight working class to defeat the sinister Bush administration in 2004, before we face a more full-blown expression of fascism that, if history is any judge, may do away with elections and other essential democratic rights.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Norman MarkowitzNew Brunswick NJ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Editorials</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Women’s reproductive rights imperiled&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No medical dictionary contains the phrase “partial birth abortion” because it is an invention of the anti-choice machine, a lurid phrase to whip up mass hysteria against reproductive choice for women, says Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The real goal, she warns, is to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1974 Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal. This was a huge step forward for women’s equality, especially for poor and working class women, who had been forced to resort to back alley abortions that killed millions.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gandy denounced the Senate’s Oct. 21 vote to ban a medical procedure as a big step toward outlawing all abortions. The House has already approved the bill and George W. Bush promises to sign it.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The American Medical Association and the American Public Health Association warn that this bill is worded so vaguely that it could criminalize even the safest and most common abortion procedures.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gandy accused the lawmakers of being “in the pocket” of right-wing extremists who are “using women’s health and lives as pawns to further a regressive agenda.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s equality organizations vow to challenge this legislation all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2000, that court overturned a similar law enacted by the Nebraska state legislature. The narrow 5 to 4 majority by which the court overturned the Nebraska legislation underlines the urgency of defeating Bush and ultra-right Republican lawmakers in the 2004 election. Several Supreme Court justices are expected to retire in the next few years, and if Bush stays in office, he can be expected to name extreme, anti-women judges in the mold of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next April 25 a “Save Women’s Lives: March for Freedom of Choice” demonstration will sound the alarm and help mobilize a huge vote to defend women’s rights by ousting Bush Nov. 2, 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*   *   *   *   *   *
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bush’s ‘jobs &amp;amp; growth’ a bust&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When George W. Bush unveiled his trillion dollar tax cut for the rich earlier this year, he trumpeted it as a “jobs and growth” program that would spur economic growth and job creation. Treasury Secretary John Snow took to the airwaves with promises of 5 million new jobs between mid-2003 and November 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But it hasn’t happened that way. In the first increase in employment in eight months, only 57,000 jobs were created in September. Welcome as that was, it fell 287,000 jobs short of the 340,000 jobs per month needed to reach the administration’s promised 5 million new jobs by November 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So it’s little wonder that Snow backtracked and came up with a promise of 2 million new jobs – fewer than 200,000 per month – between now and Election Day. But, given the fact that 170,000 new jobs are needed each month just to absorb new workers, creation of 200,000 jobs, even if achieved, will do little to lower an unemployment rate that has been above 6 percent for months.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We were told the “growth” part of the Bush tax cut would create jobs in two ways: investment by the wealthy in new factories, and increased demand for consumer goods as working families rushed to spend their “new riches.” But neither has happened.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The nation’s factories are operating at less than 73 percent of their capacity – hardly a situation calling for additional investment. Nor is $19 – the average tax reduction of nearly half of all taxpayers – going to do much to increase consumer demand.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The challenge is to make the jobs issue a defining issue in the 2004 elections. There are plenty of opportunities to do just that in the Democratic presidential primaries, the general election, and the races for 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 34 members of the U.S. Senate.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>L.A. grocery strike: A picket line report</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/l-a-grocery-strike-a-picket-line-report/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Workers’ Correspondence&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
LOS ANGELES – Millions of Southern Californians have let the giant Ralphs, Vons and Albertsons grocery chains know that, despite the victory of Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger, there has been no shift to the right in the thinking of working people. In the weeks since the strike by 70,000 members of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) union began, on Oct. 11, sprawling supermarket parking lots have remained nearly empty as consumers and workers have respected union picket lines.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The UFCW strike, along with that of 2,000 transit mechanics of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority, a sick-out by many L.A. County deputy sheriffs, impending job actions by other county workers, and potential mass layoffs of state workers, have the general populace talking about health care, unions, and standards of living.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wear a union T-shirt whenever I shop. People stare – not in shock or surprise, but to read it to see what union it is.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
At my worksite our union, SEIU/California State Employees Association, encourages us to wear our shirts each Wednesday. There is a large L.A. County worksite in the same building as our state office. Last Wednesday, a county worker accosted me as I was about to enter our office, decked out in my T-shirt. “Hi! I see you around in your shirt pretty often,” she said. “I am in SEIU Local 660, what’s yours?”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And then, almost like a bolt out of the blue she said, “Isn’t it really something, all of these people on strike? I wish all of California was on strike. We have a standard of living [to defend].” She let me know her unit may have to take job action in the coming weeks.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The other day a multiracial group of women in our dining area were talking. I overheard one mentioning how one of the grocery strikers in her neighborhood reminded her of the actress in Norma Rae. Another mentioned how someone in her church owned a store and had closed it on Sundays because he put “people before profits.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thursday I had a day off and was able to attend a solidarity rally called by the L.A. County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO attended by some 2,000 strikers and many rank and filers and officials from scores of unions. There were many, many different colored T-shirts, as strikers and their supporters surrounded the Vons/Pavilion store in Hollywood – just one of the more than 730 stores affected by the strike and lockouts.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thunderous cheers welcomed Jim Santangelo, western regional vice president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, when he announced that the Teamsters would recognize UFCW picket lines at the distribution centers of the giant chains.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Santangelo said, “Together we will kick their butts.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Miguel Contreras, executive secretary-treasurer of the 700,000-member L.A County Federation of Labor, pledged full support in order that the strikers last “one more day” than the companies. Members of the Los Angeles City Council and many state legislators pledged to join and support the picket lines in their districts. The L.A. City Council has passed a resolution “strongly endorsing the efforts of the United Food and Commercial Workers to reach a just and decent contract.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Saturday I went by three picket lines to offer support. I parked on the street though the lots were all but empty. Honking horns of supporting passersby constantly punctuated my conversations with the strikers.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
At the Vons supermarket in Eagle Rock pickets said a rally would soon be held and members of the teachers union would be supporting it. Pickets at the Albertsons store in Highland Park were talking about bringing their families to the line and joked about how supervisors inside tried to convince them this wasn’t legal. At the Vons store in Lincoln Heights, picketers had family members at their line and, looking at my T-shirt, they empathized with the plight of state workers with a new governor coming with promises of big cuts.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The weekend saw a blast of strike activity throughout the area. Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich walking a picket line in the Venice neighborhood. A Sunday morning caravan organized by Friends of Labor passing by 10 stores to support picketers in Harbor City, Carson and Torrance. Rev. Jesse Jackson joining picket line at a Vons market in Santa Monica.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney will be in town to generate more support as well.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;– Rosalio Muñoz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/l-a-grocery-strike-a-picket-line-report/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Venezuela and U.S. labor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Having seen the brilliant video “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” a couple of months ago, I was delighted to see the recent Mark Almberg interview with Venezuelan trade unionist Pedro Eusse (PWW, 10/4-10) in which Eusse voices his concern at the AFL-CIO channeling U.S. government funds into the right-wing trade union center that supported the coup attempt against President Chavez.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The PWW properly praises the AFL-CIO – a lot – for its many good deeds. The paper should also slam it for this shabby imperialist behavior masquerading as “solidarity.” “He who pays the piper calls the tune.” Planning ought to begin now among progressive U.S. trade unionists for a resolution at the next AFL-CIO convention for a policy of rejecting U.S. government money for AFL-CIO international programs.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thomas KennyNew York NY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Editor’s note: “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” is slated to be shown in San Francisco; Chicago; San Rafael, Calif.; New York City; and Los Angeles in the course of the next month. Check your local listings for exact times and places.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. owes reparations to Iraq &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A letter in a recent issue of the PWW indicated that no money of the $87 billion ought to be used in the reconstruction of Iraq. In fact, this seems to be a widely held demand in the peace movement.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I view this demand as a mistake. After nearly 13 years of war and sanctions, the U.S. definitely owes the Iraqi people something. We don’t owe them years of military occupation, however. Security and reconstruction ought to be in the hands of the UN, but the U.S. needs to kick in billions for rebuilding a country it almost single-handedly destroyed.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joel Wendlandvia e-mail&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nonpartisan elections in NYC? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On Aug. 25, our city’s Charter Revision Commission agreed to Mayor Bloomberg’s proposal for nonpartisan elections. Immediately after this action, almost all of our city’s council members stood on the steps of City Hall, denouncing this proposal. Party bosses like Tom Manton denounced it, too However, I believe that this proposal needs a chance. The established politicians claim that it would confuse voters and discourage minority candidates from running.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a nonpartisan election, independent-minded third party candidates would be able to receive more votes. The Democratic Party  claims that without party labels, people wouldn’t be able to tell what issues a candidate stands for. In my opinion, both parties are the same on most issues, especially in this city. The Democrats hold 47 out of 51 City Council seats, which looks more like a one-party council.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not only would nonpartisan elections decrease the power of political bosses, but also it would allow voters to vote for the person, not the party. Our founding father George Washington denounced the formation of political parties, and removing them from the ballot would bring us closer to his dream “of a more perfect Union.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;S. KadinskyForest Hills NY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bringing back the bad guys&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
According to recent reports our government has been recruiting former agents of the Taliban (in Afghanistan) and the mukhabarat (former secret police in Iraq) to help control their respective countries. This should work well. After all the CIA helped organize both in the first place, and both did so much good.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Richard Curtisvia e-mail&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bush Iraq policy a failure&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for Sue Webb’s opinion column on our administration’s $87 billion request (PWW, 9/20-26). While I agree with supporting the troops, I have a problem with this administration and the mainstream media (TV and print) not addressing the fact our president has not justified his reason for not relinquishing control of the country. From what I have gathered from reading my local paper and listening to the “news,” wink wink, I found that the UN and other countries are ready to present a resolution for more funding and military power if the U.S. is willing to relinquish more control. Dana Milbank and Colum Lynch of the Washington Post reported that L. Paul Bremer told Congress on 9/24 “that the United States is opposed to giving up control over the $20 billion in reconstruction funds for Iraq that the administration is seeking.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Can you tell me why there is no one of importance crying failure? I see the media and our administration downplaying “Halliburtongate.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jarvis MarlowLas Vegas NV&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Editorials</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Bush’s Cuba ploy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It must be difficult for Bush and the far right to deal with the fact that the Republican-controlled Congress just doesn’t agree with his confrontational policy towards Cuba.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Last week Bush announced new tightening of travel restrictions and expansion of anti-communist media intrusions into Cuba. No doubt it is a crude ploy to round up right-wing anti-Cuba votes for 2004. But he’s on the wrong track. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The majority of Cuban Americans support engagement, not confrontation, with Cuba. For the fourth consecutive year the House of Representatives voted to end the travel ban. And for the first time, the Senate is set to do likewise.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why does Congress oppose the White House Cuba policy? In a letter to Republican and Democratic Senate leaders, a bipartisan working group of ten senators noted that, while other nations trade with Cuba, current U.S. policy “places our farmers, workers and companies at an international competitive disadvantage.” The U.S. is losing out on an export market of nearly $1 billion a year, the senators said.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Annually 300,000 Americans travel to Cuba without permission, for fun, sun, rum and, yes, people-to-people diplomacy. The facts speak for themselves. Bans on travel and trade are not what the people or Congress want.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The cruelest hoax in the Bush re-election campaign shenanigans is his pledge to increase the number of Cubans allowed to enter the U.S. legally. In the past year, the Bush administration has processed a fraction of Cuban applications for immigration, in hopes of setting off a “boat people” crisis. At the same time, the White House has threatened to take military action against boats headed toward the U.S., to defend our borders from terrorists.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bush calls for “free and fair” elections in Cuba and for Fidel Castro to step down as preconditions for easing the trade and travel bans. In fact, “free and fair” elections right here in the U.S., and the defeat of Bush and the far right in 2004, are the key to better U.S.-Cuba relations.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*   *   *   *   *   *
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A racist Republican power grab&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
With House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) pulling the strings, the Texas legislature has enacted and Gov. Rick Perry has signed a new congressional district plan aimed at adding eight Republicans to the Texas House delegation in Washington.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The plan segregates African Americans and Latinos into a handful of districts, making them political ghettoes. For example, Rep. Martin Frost, a  Democrat who represents parts of Dallas, had African American neighborhoods torn out of his district and lumped with the district of Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, a Black Democrat.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Frost charges that the aim of this “Perrymandering” is to plant in white voters’ minds the idea that the Democratic Party is the “party of minorities.” Gov. Perry’s spokesperson, Bob Richter, didn’t even bother to deny it. “In a way it may be true,” he said. “Look at the makeup of the Texas House: 62 Democrats and only 19 Anglos, no Anglo woman.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
He defended the new districts as “opportunity districts” but in fact this map reduces the clout of Black and Latino voters in violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. It is possible to draw lines to apportion the Black and Latino vote in two or more districts so that, together with a bloc of white voters, two Black or Latino candidates can win elective office, not just one. Clumping the Black and Latino vote, as the DeLay-inspired plan does, undermines that possibility. It also destroys the multiracial unity of racially diverse districts. It reinforces the racist notion that no white voter will cast a ballot for an African American candidate no matter how qualified. It is just as racist as “at large” districts that also dilute the impact of Black voters by undermining their ability to unite behind a candidate in a single district.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If approved by the Justice Department, the DeLay plan will be challenged in the courts. We salute the valiant Texas lawmakers who fought this racist power grab, and join in demanding that it be rejected.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Strikes rock Bolivia</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/strikes-rock-bolivia/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Bolivia’s President Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada, in an increasingly desperate effort to quell the massive strikes, demonstrations and peasant roadblocks that have virtually paralyzed Bolivia for over a month, announced on Oct. 13 that he was temporarily suspending his plan to export natural gas through Chile to the United States.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The government has decided it will not export natural gas to new markets … until consultations have been conducted [with the Bolivian people],” he told reporters. The “consultation period” will run until Dec. 31.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Union, peasant, student, and indigenous Indian groups have opposed the proposed gas export plan, arguing that Bolivia’s vast natural gas reserves should be used in Bolivia for the people’s benefit. They have denounced Sánchez de Lozada’s “free trade” policies and many have called for the nationalization of the oil and gas industries.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But the president’s retreat has done nothing to stem a rising tide of rebellion and a deepening crisis of his regime. Despite his announcement, thousands marched in La Paz, the capital, demanding Sánchez de Lozada’s resignation, and a public transit strike – combined with continuing highway and road blockages by militant peasants and miners – brought the city to a standstill. Food and gasoline are in increasingly short supply in the capital.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tensions were brought to a boiling point last week after the government called out thousands of troops backed by tanks to suppress the rebellion, particularly in the city of El Alto, a poor, industrial suburb of La Paz.  El Alto, which has a population of 750,000, has been a major center of the general strike. Most of its residents are of Indian origin. The city was put under martial law and the population was brutally suppressed.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Over 55 people have been killed in the violent military crackdown in recent weeks, many of them in El Alto. Clashes have been intense in other towns, too, notably Cochabamba, Oruro and Potosi.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While the natural gas export plan was the immediate cause of the crisis, its roots go much deeper. Bolivia, a Texas-sized country with a population of 8 million, is one of the poorest nations of Latin America, with over 70 percent of its population mired in extreme poverty.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bolivia has long been under the economic and political domination of the United States. Its workers have been subject to extreme exploitation. Many thousands of its peasants have been driven to bankruptcy and ruin. Its mineral resources, including its vast natural gas reserves, crude oil, zinc, tungsten and gold, have been subject to systemic plunder by U.S. mining and petrochemical companies for decades.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The current president, Sánchez de Lozada, 73, was born and grew up in the U.S. He is a millionaire businessman and a close ally of George W. Bush. He took office in August 2002 after winning only 22 percent of the vote. In February of this year, he tried to push through an IMF-inspired austerity program that would have drastically cut the living standards of the workers and peasants. That plan, too, sparked a major rebellion and claimed at least 32 lives before the government was forced to make concessions.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This time around it appears that Sánchez de Lozada is in even deeper trouble. His vice president, Carlos Mesa, has openly criticized his superior’s policies, and four of the 15 cabinet members have resigned in protest.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Evo Morales, an indigenous union leader and member of the Bolivian Congress, said “the only political solution to this crisis is the resignation of the president,” according to the Associated Press. Roberto de la Cruz, a union leader in El Alto, said “We will not stop until he (the president) goes away.” The unrelenting pressure of the strikers and peasant demonstrators suggests that Sánchez de Lozada may in fact be forced out soon.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ominously, the U.S. warned this week that it will “not tolerate” any move to topple the current regime. “The American people and their government support Bolivia’s democratically-elected president … in his bid to build a more prosperous and just future for all Bolivians,” a State Department statement said.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Bush administration is increasingly nervous about the mounting turmoil in Latin America – particularly in Bolivia, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Argentina, and Brazil – and the growing opposition to the U.S.-backed Free Trade Area of the Americas. It remains to be seen how much longer this turmoil can be contained.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at malmberg@pww.org&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/strikes-rock-bolivia/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Freedom Ride shakes up political landscape</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/freedom-ride-shakes-up-political-landscape/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Armed with solidarity, songs and the legacy of America’s civil rights movement, two busloads of immigrants and their African-American, white, Arab-, Asian-, and Latin-American supporters faced down dozens of Department of Homeland Security agents and their dogs in the heart of Texas last week. The drama played out at one of the border patrol “checkpoints” set up to apprehend and deport suspected “illegal” immigrants.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The agents placed the riders in a detention center and attempted to interrogate them about their immigration status. But the riders asserted both their constitutional right to remain silent and their human right to sing. University of Arizona student Inez Duarte wrote in her journal, “The Freedom Riders sang ‘We Shall Overcome’ and ‘This Little Light of Mine.’ These songs are our gospel. These songs keep us strong.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This solidarity was reinforced by a flood of phone calls and faxes from the AFL-CIO, the Catholic Church, and members of Congress and, no doubt, by the fact that 16 other buses and a thousand other Freedom Riders were at that very moment crisscrossing the nation carrying a message to Washington, D.C., from the tens of thousands of people who had come out to greet them. The border patrol halted the interrogations and released the buses after a tense four hours.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The dramatic outcome of this act of mass heroism illustrates the important contribution made by the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride. It has put immigrant rights high on the nation’s political agenda.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty million U.S. residents are foreign-born, a result of the fact that migration of workers is an intrinsic, on-going feature of capitalism, and of our country’s history. Winning voting rights for an entire section of our working class which had been marginalized and incorrectly viewed as peripheral and temporary would be a fundamental expansion of democracy in our country.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IWFR journey culminated in mass lobbying on Capitol Hill by those denied the right to vote and their supporters, boldly asserting the demand for a voice in the political process for these millions of disenfranchised. By demanding the right to citizenship and rights at work for immigrants, the IWFR points to this bloc of worker/voters as a huge resource for our working class – for both building the labor movement and expanding the electorate, including in places of low union density like the South and the “heartland” states.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IWFR was conceived by HERE, the hotel and restaurant employees union, in response to the problems faced by many of its members, whose lives were shadowed by the inequality, fear, and destruction of families that have resulted from unjust immigration policies. HERE was joined by five of the nation’s most actively organizing unions – UNITE!, Laborers, Service Employees, Food and Commercial Workers, and Farm Workers – and the AFL-CIO’s constituency groups representing African American, Latino, Asian Pacific, women and GLBT unionists. The organizers reached out to African American leaders and civil rights groups who, in turn, embraced the link with the historic Freedom Rides of the 1960s. Local unions, Native American groups, the religious community, and immigrants of every nationality were included in local coalitions. Unions assigned resources and core staff who worked for months to build ongoing local coalitions. With unprecedented unity based on the IWFR’s goals – legalization and a path to citizenship, civil rights, workplace rights, and family unification – the question of immigrants’ rights, which employers and the right have used as a divisive wedge issue, was transformed into a unity issue.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride sets the tone for the 2004 elections by taking the offensive. It has connected the issues of democracy and on-the-job rights, built local coalitions, and perhaps most important, linked the people’s struggles to grassroots political participation. At many of the 100 Freedom Ride rallies across the country, participants, including the undocumented, eagerly received “civic participation” kits handed out by union organizers. The kits contained information on phone banking, precinct walking, voter registration and get-out-the-vote activities. The IWFR puts the people’s movement on the road to making voting an act of mass fightback in 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Roberta Wood is labor editor of the PWW. She can be reached at rwood@pww.org&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/freedom-ride-shakes-up-political-landscape/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Support ‘Marriage Equality’&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bush’s support of “Marriage Protection Week” is a public relations ploy developed by a right-wing coalition bent on denying same-sex couples equal legal protection under the law. These groups claim they merely wish to protect “family values,” but there are millions of American families with gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender members. The support of any effort to hurt the legal and emotional well-being of these families through this so-called marriage protection effort is a direct assault on the very family values these extremist groups pretend to uphold.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, “Marriage Equality Week,” being held simultaneously from Oct. 12-18, supports the right of all families to enjoy the legal rights and privileges that marriage offers, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. These rights, now denied to countless families throughout our country, cover more than 1,000 legal protections and responsibilities the federal government extends to married couples, including the right to take leave from work to care for a spouse, the right for the widowed to collect Social Security benefits, and the right to fight for child custody. All people should have the same standing and constitutional right to equality under the law.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Barbara RussumChicago IL&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where’s the proof? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
His justifications for going to war having been laughably discredited by David Kay’s virtually empty Iraq weapons report, George Bush nonetheless continues to willfully assert that he vanquished “a clear and imminent threat” to America’s security. As proof, the president seizes on one little vial of botulism bug that was discovered in an Iraqi scientist’s kitchen refrigerator, the most tangible evidence yet to be produced by Kay’s $300 million fishing expedition. Now, we skeptics can be gratefully assured that, thanks to our commander-in-chief’s unilateral invasion of Iraq, a nasty case of food poisoning has been averted somewhere. All hail to the Chief!
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cord MacGuireBoulder CO&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perils of the ‘socialist market economy’&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Erwin Marquit’s article (PWW, 7/12) on attempts by China and Vietnam to survive in today’s capitalist world by permitting capitalist economic institutions to “co-exist” with socialist ones in their countries is useful and helpful, but we should remember that the main problems faced by countries born of socialist revolutions was that they were poor in capital and technology and forced to “socialize poverty,” using often coercive forms of public planning to develop rapidly in a world where they were directly threatened by hostile capitalist economic and military powers.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While all those who support socialism wish the Chinese and Vietnamese well, socialist “mixed economies” increased economic and social divisions over time in Yugoslavia, where Tito adopted such a program in the late 1940s, and served as the rationale for Mikhail Gorbachev’s disastrous Perestroika policies in the Soviet Union, which stimulated the rise of a private sector based on a sinister alliance of black marketeers and state bureaucrats, who siphoned resources from the public sector and eventually overthrew the Soviet state and dismembered the Soviet Union in order to try to establish full-fledged capitalism.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Using market mechanisms to develop socialist societies may be advisable or even necessary, but this is a far cry from supporting private corporations and large-scale private ownership of the productive forces in more advanced economies in the name of some abstract “socialist market economy.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Norman MarkowitzNew Brunswick NJ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Constructive criticisms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I have been a reader of People’s Weekly World for many years, since it was the Daily World, in fact. However, I must strongly object to a couple of items I read in the Sept. 27-Oct. 3 issue. In the front-page article, “Soldier’s dad to Bush: Stop playing with lives,” it says that the antiwar coalition Win Without War held a news conference demanding the firing of “Rumsfeld and transfer of authority in Iraq to the United Nations.” It says “Congress should reject the $87 billion requested by Bush unless these two conditions are met.” Well, excuse me, but that’s not good enough. Congress should reject Bush’s request for the $87 billion no matter what. Why waste more money on this illegal, immoral war under any circumstances?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The other item is about the praise for Neil Young’s new CD “Greendale” in the music review. After Neil Young supported Reagan in 1980 and, to my knowledge, still tries to justify it, I could never bring myself to patronize his music even if I liked it.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mike BergMorrisville PA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Editorials</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Stand up, keep fighting&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While it’s too soon to offer a full analysis of the recall of Calif. Gov. Gray Davis and his replacement by Arnold Schwarzenegger, some factors are fairly clear:
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• Anger over the economy. Polls and interviews indicate wide anger over the state’s fiscal problems and budget crisis. A survey of 4,000 California voters on Oct. 7 showed deep pessimism about the state’s economy.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• The use of racism and anti-immigrant hysteria. For example, the ultra-right suggested that Davis, by signing a bill enabling undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses, was giving a green light to terrorism. Schwarzenegger and the GOP did not hesitate to slur Mexican Americans and Native Americans to divert discussion away from real issues and solutions. Nevertheless, voters saw through and defeated racist Prop. 54.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• The continuing influence of male chauvinism. How else can one explain the promotion and legitimization of a blatant abuser of women?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• The role of big money and the corporate media. The recall was launched by millionaire Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who paid huge sums to hire professional signature collectors, many using fake California addresses. The biggest single source of recall campaign money – $10.3 million – was Schwarzenegger’s personal bank account. The ever more monopolized corporate media, who increasingly blur the lines between entertainment, advertising and reality, helped Schwarzenegger translate his celebrity persona into votes.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
• The failure of centrist Democrats who don’t take a fighting stand on behalf of working families. Davis largely failed to fight for the concerns of workers, minorities, and the poor. When he finally did so, in the last weeks of the recall campaign, it was too little and too late. Even among those who voted against the recall, there was major unhappiness with Davis.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The ultra-right uses fake populist millionaire front men like George W. Bush and Arnold Schwarzenegger to advance their pro-corporate agenda. But they don’t have the last word.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Like Paul Wellstone said: Stand up, keep fighting. Like Gus Hall said: It takes a fight to win!
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*   *   *   *   *   *
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;White House crime&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Question: “When do you know George W. Bush is lying?”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: “When his lips are moving.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
That witticism sprang to mind as Bush solemnly vowed full cooperation with Attorney General John Ashcroft’s probe of who among “senior White House” officials “outed” CIA operative Valerie Plame.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is a felony to publicly identify an undercover officer, so, for the first time, the Bush White House is facing a criminal investigation. But the aroma of crime has wafted through the Bush White House for as long as he has resided there – for example, the crony ties to Enron CEO Ken Lay, who led the swindle of thousands of Enron workers and Enron stockholders. But the Bush-Cheney gang succeeded in tamping down the Enron scandal.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the CIA itself has demanded the criminal probe. Plame’s husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, has questioned whether Bush strategist Karl Rove at least condoned and may have actually leaked Plame’s name to right-wing commentator Robert Novak.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Plame was outed six days after Wilson criticized Bush in a New York Times op ed article for using forged documents in his State of the Union speech to bolster claims that Iraq was seeking to obtain uranium from Niger. The Vice President sent Wilson to Niger to examine those documents and he reported back that they were forgeries. Why, Wilson demanded, did Bush use those forgeries to justify his drive to war? Wilson has been on the airwaves and in the headlines ever since, hammering the administration for those “sixteen words” and for stabbing his wife in the back in a gangland style vendetta.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
To put Ashcroft in charge of this probe is a classic example of putting the fox in charge of the hen house. Rather, a special prosecutor must be appointed with broad powers to investigate not only the outing of Plame, but also the full story of the lies Bush used to stampede the nation into a needless, bloody war.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Israel attacks Syria, vows more strikes</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/israel-attacks-syria-vows-more-strikes/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Taking a page from the “preemptive warfare” book of the Bush administration, the Israeli government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon brazenly sent warplanes to bomb what it called a “Palestinian militant training camp” deep inside Syrian territory on Oct. 5. It was the first major Israeli attack on Syrian territory in 30 years. The Syrian press described the site of the bombing, Ein Saheb, as a Palestinian refugee camp.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As the justification for its actions, the Israeli government cited the suicide bombing of a restaurant in the Israeli port city of Haifa the day before. It couched its rationale for the strike in Bush’s language of the “war on terrorism.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
President Bush immediately leapt to the defense of Sharon’s actions, saying that he refused to criticize the bombing raid and that Israel “must not feel constrained” in doing what it deems necessary “to protect the homeland.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hours later, an emboldened Sharon said Israel would “hit its enemies any place and in any way,” threatening still more attacks on Syria and, by implication, other nations like Lebanon and Iran. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
World leaders reacted with alarm. United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan deplored the air raid, noting that “this further escalation of an already tense and difficult situation has the potential to broaden the scope of current conflicts in the Middle East, further threatening regional peace and stability.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Arab League, meeting in an emergency session in Cairo, said the situation could lead to “uncontrollable consequences, which could drag the whole region into a violent whirlpool.” Several countries, including France, Germany, and the U.K., denounced the action as a violation of international law and of Syria’s sovereignty.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Israeli raid took place only a day after the deadly suicide bombing in Haifa, in which 20 persons died and at least 55 were injured. The seaside restaurant, Maxim Coffee-Restaurant, was jointly owned by Jews and Arabs and its clientele was similarly mixed. In many ways it was a showcase of Jewish-Arab cooperation. It was therefore a peculiar target of a suicide bombing attack. The resulting carnage was deplored by both Jewish and Arab leaders in the city.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The suicide bomber, Hanadi Jaradat, was a 27-year-old Palestinian woman apprentice lawyer from Jenin, whose brother, Fadi, 23, was shot to death in Jenin four months ago, and whose cousin, Saleh, 31, was killed during an Israeli military crackdown.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Haifa’s former mayor and now Knesset Labor deputy Amram Mitzna said in a television interview that the bombing was the result of Sharon’s intransigence: “Haifa has become the latest victim of the hard-line anti-peace policy of Ariel Sharon and his ilk, who know only military strikes, instead of negotiations with the Palestinians.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately after the Haifa restaurant bombing, Palestinian President Yasser Arafat and other spokespersons from the Palestinian Authority denounced the suicide attack as causing grave damage to the Palestinian cause. In spite of this, Israeli government spokespersons again placed the blame on Arafat, holding him directly responsible for the attack. Some cabinet ministers demanded once again that Arafat be exiled or “liquidated.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The reiteration of these threats, which have been popping up with greater frequency, prompted a group from the Israeli Gush-Shalom peace bloc led by Uri Avnery to enter the partly destroyed headquarters of Arafat in Ramallah to offer the Palestinian leader the protection of a human shield. They were joined by 26 international peace activists from the U.S., Australia, Canada, Ireland and the U.K.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The larger backdrop for the escalation of tensions in the region has been Israel’s relentless building of hundreds of new illegal settlements, its continuing construction of an apartheid wall along the West Bank border, and its unceasing policy of assassinating Palestinian leaders and invading Palestinian towns. The Sharon government appears to be increasingly reckless and bold in its efforts to drive Palestinians off their land, and it has gotten solid support for this campaign from the Bush administration and Congress.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at malmberg@pww.org. 
Hans Lebrecht contributed to this article.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/israel-attacks-syria-vows-more-strikes/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Letters</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Name 135th Street for Ben Davis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article on the centennial of the birth of Benjamin J. Davis (PWW/NM, 9/6). It made me think of Davis’ achievements, including Black History Week; anti-lynching bills; the Herndon trial; more firehouses for Harlem. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Today his name is all but forgotten, often mistaken for a military hero of the same name. There are streets and parks in Harlem named for many historic Black figures, and yet, not one for Davis. Maybe it is time to rename Riverton Houses for Davis – they were built during his administration. Maybe 135th Street could be renamed – it was the home of the Communist Party during Davis’ career.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I find it unconscionable how forgotten Ben Davis’ legacy is. I hope that by 2004, the 40th anniversary of his passing, our city’s leaders can find a proper way to honor him.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sergio KadinskyForest Hills NY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iraqi Council a powerless body&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One thing that Susan Webb’s News Analysis (PWW/NM, 7/19) addressing the U.S. formation of a Governing Council in Iraq sadly failed to mention was that the Iraq Communist Party’s decision to join the Council gives this powerless body legitimacy that it does not deserve.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. formed the Council as an attempt to give the impression to Iraqis and the world that Iraqis will be involved in governing the nation when we know that this will never be the case until the U.S. Army is forced to leave the country.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tim PelzerVancouver, BC, Canada&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Editor’s note: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We support the approach of most Communist Parties that communists have to be involved in the major arenas of struggle.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In pre-revolutionary czarist Russia, Lenin called for communists to participate in the Duma (Parliament) even though it was closely controlled by the far right. Our impression is that the Iraqi Governing Council in its present form is the result of struggle by varied Iraqi political forces coming together in a common effort to get some kind of decision-making role and begin to take back power from the U.S.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The ICP says it views the council as an important arena of struggle. Iraqi Communists, on the front lines of struggle in Iraq, are in a better position than we are to assess the circumstances there. What we do know for sure is that we have to focus on defeating the dangerous imperial policies of the Bush administration.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lying and dying at Ground Zero&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Various unions are asking for just compensation for the workers who were injured while cleaning up what was left of the World Trade Center. The White House apparently withheld information about how dangerous the air was. Now, the workers have the long-term risk of asbestos-related lung cancer as well as other debilitating respiratory ailments, according to the AFL-CIO.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Outside the labor movement publications, there has been very little said or written about this disgrace, and that is disgusting. Even more disgusting is this: the cleanup at Ground Zero was made a hot priority up to a certain point. That certain point occurred very quickly after the trucks pulled in to haul off the gold that was near the bottom of the rubble.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The rush in the rubble was not really to save lives or identify victims. It was the gold.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jim LaneDallas TX&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cover-up at the White House&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This morning’s (9/29) White House press conference has left this reader in a state of shock.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There is substantial evidence to believe the White House has deliberately misused classified intelligence and broken federal law in order to intimidate and silence a whistleblower, former Ambassador Joe Wilson.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Exposing an undercover CIA operative is a federal crime and the severest violation of national security one can think of. The White House’s claim to ignorance, “no information has been brought to our attention,” is wholly unsatisfactory and indicates to this reader that there is a cover-up going on at the very highest levels of the administration.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Patriotic Americans should demand an investigation be held outside the supervision of the Ashcroft-run Justice Department. Congress should either appointment a special prosecutor or hold its own congressional investigation to get to the bottom of this national security disaster.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The fate of our democracy hangs in the balance.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Michael H. WangNew York NY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/letters-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Editorials</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;No on recall, no on Prop. 54&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Californians will go to the polls Oct. 7 and be asked whether or not Gov. Gray Davis should be recalled and, in the case of Proposition 54, whether the state of California should totally ignore race as a factor in any of its affairs. To both the recall and Prop. 54 we say a resounding “no.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The recall isn’t about Davis. The recall is about something larger than Davis. It’s about an ultra-right power grab and the Bush administration positioning itself to steal the 2004 elections. Such far-right power grabs are also taking place in other states like Texas and Colorado.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
California is a solid Democratic voting electorate and is the most populous and racially-diverse state in the country. In the last years, and even the last months, the Democratic majority California legislature has passed progressive, pro-working families, pro-immigrant laws, signed by Davis, which corporations and the far right are anxious to repeal. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
California has also the fifth largest economy in the world, so it would suit these big moneyed interests to have politicians who would serve them and not the interests of working people, racially and nationally oppressed, immigrants and women. Davis has certainly responded to the pressures and demands of the labor and people’s movements, another thing the far right hates.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Prop. 54 is a cynical attempt by anti-affirmative action proponent Ward Connerly to further cover-up the fact that race and in particular racism is still prevalent in government and business. This proposition would prohibit the state from collecting any information concerning race, ethnicity, color or national origin, which would prevent proving patterns of racism and discrimination. Like in the arguments against affirmative action, Prop. 54 exists in a make-believe world, suggesting that if we all are just color-blind racism will just fade away. Prop. 54 continues the far right’s divide and conquer strategy and should be resoundingly defeated.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*   *   *   *   *   *
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding fuel to the fire&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Two reports by the Census Bureau – one showing a 1.7 million increase in the number of people living in poverty and a second showing a 2.4 million increase in the number without health insurance – paint a harsh picture of growing economic hardship and insecurity for America’s working families.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But there are also some big winners, a fact made abundantly clear in a report by the Congressional Budget Office.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
According to the CBO, the gulf between rich and poor more than doubled from 1979 to 2000. The after-tax income of the top 1 percent of taxpayers in 2000 averaged $862,700, triple the $286,300 they had in 1979. By comparison, the after tax income of the bottom 40 percent averaged $21,118, up barely 13 percent from 1979.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The policies of George W. Bush are adding fuel to the fire. Tax cuts for the rich; corporate cronyism at the expense of workers and retirees; privatization and cuts in health, education, veterans’ benefits; draining the treasury for an unjustified war.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These reports provide the background against which many of the 2004 electoral battles will be fought. And it’s not just “will be” – battles are already under way in the halls of Congress: on taxes, prescription drugs for seniors, further attacks on Constitutional liberties, more billions for the occupation of Iraq.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And they can be won. The Sept. 24 poll by Zogby International shows that Bush’s negatives at 49 percent nearly equal his positives at 50 percent, and that a growing number of people question the direction in which the country is headed. And last but not least, a majority of Democratic presidential hopefuls have become more aggressive in their criticism of Bush.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The challenge before the Dump Bush movement is to find the way to build a powerful majority firestorm out of the flames of discontent that are beginning to blaze across the country. For our part we see this as our number one task between now and Election Day 2004.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/editorials-26114/</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Venezuela today: a trade unionist speaks out</title>
			<link>http://peoplesworld.org/venezuela-today-a-trade-unionist-speaks-out/</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Pedro Eusse, the 40-year-old General Secretary of Venezuela’s United Confederation of Workers (CUTV), is a man with a mission. “For us trade unionists it is very important to meet with leaders and members of unions in the United States, so we can tell them the truth about what’s happening in our country,” he told me during an hour-long interview on Sept. 19. The CUTV is one of Venezuela’s five main labor federations. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Getting the truth out is particularly difficult, he said, because the privately-owned mass media in Venezuela is so hostile to the workers and the mass democratic movement there. The wealthy, right-wing elements are especially vicious in their attacks on Venezuela President Hugo Chavez.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The CUTV is made up mainly of industrial unions: metal, textile, construction, chemical, and auto parts. It also includes some service workers and public workers. 
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Eusse spoke to the World during a visit to Chicago, a stopover in a multi-city tour of the U.S. We asked him to describe conditions in Venezuela today, three years into the Chavez administration.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The Chavez government has inherited many problems from the previous administration that followed neoliberal policies,” he said. “We have lots of unemployment, marginalization, poverty, and insecurity – problems common to all of Latin America. The Chavez government is doing all that it can to get to the root of these problems, but it hasn’t been easy.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Complicating matters, Eusse said, has been the “resistance of capital.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“Politically and socially powerful forces are trying to put the brakes on what’s happening in our country,” he said. “They are continuously destabilizing the situation, engaging in economic sabotage, and are otherwise trying to wreck the economy.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Two prime examples of this sabotage, he said, were the right-wing coup attempt in April 2002 and the general lockout (“not a strike,” Eusse emphasized) by the employers’ association, Fedecamaras, in December 2002 through January 2003.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The coup attempt against Chavez, while successfully blocked by the people and democratic forces in the military, resulted in serious economic disruptions. The lockout at the end of 2002 took the form of big plant managers actively blocking production or abandoning their posts altogether, he said. This maneuver was particularly disruptive to the oil industry.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“Petroleum accounts for 80 percent of our export earnings,” Eusse said. “The managers sabotaged production for 60 days, resulting in economic losses of $7 billion to $8 billion. The action not only hurt us in oil and natural gas revenues, but it disrupted many other sectors of the economy, too, including food production.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence, he said, these disruptions have caused unemployment to increase from 11 percent in 2001 to 20 percent in 2003.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Eusse said, “Lots of businesses have been closing so as to put pressure on the Chavez government, to bring it down. But this has been met by workers taking over enterprises when they’re abandoned, often doing so with the support of local communities. The workers then transform the enterprise into a cooperative, owned by the workers and the community. More and more of these are being organized.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the economic challenges, however, the Chavez government has been able to increase spending on social programs that benefit the workers and poor.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“Chavez has greatly increased the amount of the money spent on education, for example,” Eusse said. “He eliminated school fees for elementary and secondary schools, so now hundreds of thousands of students are in school who otherwise would not have been because they’re poor.” Such initiatives have included the setting up of the Bolivarian University of Venezuela, which has opened its doors to children of working-class and poor families for the first time.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“Or take the question of people’s health,” Eusse said. “Many poor neighborhoods in Caracas and other cities now have health care, where previously they had none. Chavez appealed to our medical community to help provide health care for the poor, but got only about 50 volunteers. A big number of Cuban doctors have come to our country as volunteers and they have been a big help.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We asked Eusse to comment on the state of the trade union movement in Venezuela.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“About 16 percent of the working class is organized into unions,” Eusse said. “It’s a modest percentage, but that’s the case almost everywhere.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“There are three factors that have given rise to this low percentage,” he said. “First, the high level of unemployment. Second, our level of economic development is less than it could be, especially because ‘free trade’ has caused the deindustrialization of a good part of our economy. As a result, there are many people, over 50 percent of the population, who are self-employed or otherwise working in the ‘informal’ sector of the economy.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The third factor contributing to the low level of unionization, Eusse said, is the negative example of the dominant trade union federation, the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers (CTV).
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The CTV is now dominated by corrupt and sell-out elements. The leadership supported the coup, and now they go around with the right-wing parties against Chavez. Many workers think that this is what all unions are like. They see it as a bosses’ union. As a result, they don’t want anything to do with unions.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Eusse said that as a result of the leadership’s anti-worker policies, the CTV has been badly discredited over the past couple of years, and, as a result, “hundreds of local unions have left it and newly-organized unions have not been affiliating with it.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Further, “Venezuela is one of the very few governments in Latin America, maybe with the sole exception of Cuba, that has unambiguously stated its opposition to the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA),” Eusee said, referring to the Bush administration’s economic scheme for dominating the hemisphere. “Yet the CTV supports the FTAA.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Eusse stresses that the rank-and-file members of the CTV are largely in support of the changes underway in Venezuela. “Some of the member unions, even those who don’t support Chavez, don’t support the right, either.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Eusse is troubled by the AFL-CIO’s continued support for the CTV. “We want to influence the AFL-CIO leadership to change its position and to cease its support for the CTV. It’s in the best interests of U.S. labor that it do so, too.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We asked Eusse about the Chavez government’s attitude towards unions.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The Chavez government has been facilitating all sorts of initiatives for grassroots organization among women and youth, for instance. This attitude applies to workers and their unions, too. For example, the new Bolivarian Constitution (adopted under Chavez), guarantees the right to organize. This was true before, but now these rights are more specifically guaranteed.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“There is a new law that says employers can’t fire an employee for organizing. This gives workers much more freedom to organize into unions. Now any group of workers who have signed authorization cards can get recognized. The process is much easier,” he said.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, Eusse said, there’s been a big increase in union membership.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We asked him about other forms of workers’ and people’s organizations.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“The government has helped in setting up thousands of cooperatives, both urban and rural. It has given them help of various kinds – with financial credit, technical advice, and information. It’s also made it easier for the co-ops to sell their products to the state and get fair compensation.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes that compensation has taken the form of in-kind payments in the form of oil, he said. “One of the most important things that workers got when the state petroleum company locked out its workers is this: when they failed and when their managers were ousted, the workers got real access and control to the company. Before it was almost like a state within a state. Now the workers know what’s going on. They can also do things like make petroleum accessible to the co-ops on reasonable terms. This helps our economic development.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What about the role of women?
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“There is a very high participation of women in the revolutionary process and in political life, and there’s been a fight to extend their rights in every area. The Constitution clearly expresses this. For example, it uses ‘he’ and ‘she’ throughout when referring to our citizens. Many women’s organizations are involved in the process,” he said.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Eusse noted that the Chavez government had set up a National Institute for Women, the purpose of which is to promote women’s participation in unions, politics, and the development of economic policies. The government even set up a Women’s Bank, which more readily gives loans to women.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We asked Pedro Eusse if there is anything else he’d like to say.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“If there is one country where we need solidarity, it is here in the United States,” he said. “The best way to confront imperialism and the multinationals is through the unity of workers, within Latin America and between North and South. North American workers are suffering from the same policies, especially job loss. We face a common enemy. We have a common cause.”
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author can be reached at malmberg@pww.org. Thanks to Megan Marshall for her assistance in translation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
			
			
			<guid>http://peoplesworld.org/venezuela-today-a-trade-unionist-speaks-out/</guid>
		</item>
		

	</channel>
</rss>